• Spence Pugh posted an update 1 week, 3 days ago

    Let’s consider the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.

    Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to something that shares idc’s server resources with other users.

    Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

    The rental type has the advantage of having a server on idc, so it doesn’t have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.

    However, you need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

    There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.

    Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

    It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn’t just a Webhard, it’s a company.

    It is because it is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.

    Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.

    It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.

    If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

    OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

    By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company’s homepage plus the Webhard’s original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the perfect solution is.

    The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, that may be fully built in Soho, so the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.

    It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.

    Rental vs. Construction.

    Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows one to download files on the internet at a fixed monthly cost. Because of this the usage of web hard has become common.

    But it’s not just lately that this concept came out, and it’s true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many office workers who didn’t join it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.

    The biggest background of the phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. p2p 순위 Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company won’t adopt it.

    In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users’ needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), that is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.

    NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly reduce the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It’s a really good feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without having to buy an authorized IP.

    Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations as the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. Because the word “basic” implies, it isn’t a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Therefore, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it’s a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very helpful solution that’s significantly less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.

    Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I’ll check out the rough features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one in line with the reality and needs.