Activity

  • Kudsk Dam posted an update 6 months, 4 weeks ago

    donwload site

    When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

    Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

    When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

    Web app is supported. It’s rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

    File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

    Webhard

    It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

    Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

    When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only must be in a folder.

    You should share a URL and that means you can’t share music files or videos.

    According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It’s a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It’s much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

    It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it’s the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, let’s assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it’s often cut off at that point)

    It has a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

    You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.

    Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it’s about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn’t smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it’s in that state, you need to find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

    The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

    Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

    Google Drive

    It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

    It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

    It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

    If you don’t upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

    Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn’t bother me.

    There are the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It’s a bit of a problem that the app doesn’t connect at all on mobile, but it’s the best in the desktop environment.

    Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

    There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it isn’t stipulated by company policy.

    If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it’s the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and use MS word, right?)

    Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?)

    Dropbox

    It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, if you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It’s the best in the world with regards to media reading.

    There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.

    The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn’t work with Google Drive.

    The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.

    The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It’s practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

    The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

    Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards…

    You will find a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.

    Word documents shouldn’t flip different files like picture documents.

    The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

    There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

    Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

    File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the net page’s resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

    Slow. Not paid people.

    Media access is very disadvantageous. It’s a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it’s disadvantageous above. It’s easier to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.

    The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

    In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

    If you don’t install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it’s significantly less than Google Drive).

    It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***

    Skydrive

    The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive’s is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we’ve often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

    웹하드 순위 The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn’t that strong a difference.

    It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.